MAXess

Measuring accessibility in policy evaluation

Project details

Duration

08.2015-07.2018

Sponsor

external pageERAfrica 7th EU Framework Programme

Staff

Prof. Dr. K.W. Axhausen and Dr. T. Dubernet

Partners

  • TU Berlin
  • University of Nairobi
  • University of Pretoria

Summary

Although the complex interactions between land use and transport are often acknowledged and appreciated, the state of practice in evaluating infrastructure investment decisions is to fall back on purely transport- and mobility-related metrics. Especially when there is large economic inequality among citizens, answering the questions “Who gets the infrastructure benefits?” and “Who pays for the infrastructure?” become loaded and controversial.

Publications

Geurs, K.T., A. De Montis and A. Reggiani (2015) Editorial: Recent advances and applications in accessibility modelling, Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 49, 82-85. external pageDOI

Bocarejo S., J.P. and D.R. Oviedo H. (2014) Transport accessibility and social inequities: A tool for identification of mobility needs and evaluation of transport investments, Journal of Transport Geography, 24, 142-154. external pageDOI

Fox, J., A. Daly, S. Hess and E. Miller (2014) Temporal transferability of models of mode-destination choice for the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area, Journal of Transport and Land Use, 7 (2) 41-62. external pageDOI

Nicolai, T.W. and K. Nagel (2011) Investigating accessibility indicators for feedback from a travel to a land use model, SustainCity Working Paper, 6.2, TU Berlin. DownloadDownload

De Jong, G., M. Pieters, A. Daly. I. Graafland-Essers, E. Kroes and C. Koopmans (2005) Using the logsum as an evaluation measure: Literature and case study, Working papers, WR-275-AVV, RAND Corporation, Santa Monica. external pageDownload

JavaScript has been disabled in your browser